Nixon

By Imran Garda in Americas on December 4th, 2010
Photo by AFP

You shouldn't be reading this but...

We seem to have an innate fascination with secrets.

By Marwan Bishara in Imperium on May 28th, 2010
AFP photo

As the Obama administration introduces its new foreign policy doctrine this week, it's worth reminding ourselves that the greater Middle East region is central to US strategy today just as it has been over the last half a century.

After a decade of US blunders in Iraq and Afghanistan under the guise of the "global war on terror", President Obama's overall commitment to "engagement" with other world emerging powers like China and India,  and support for multilateralism contrasts sharply with his predecessor's desire to "go it alone" when possible, along with others only if necessary.

Over the last year, the Obama administration has changed the bombastic language of the Bush administration.

By James Bays in Asia on November 6th, 2009
Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images

I watched the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s speech from my office in Kabul. Much of it was predictable, although the language was strong, keeping up the pressure on President Karzai, which has come in recent days from President Obama, and UN Representative Kai Eide.

I think his suggestion that a figure “of international stature” should lead a new anti-corruption agency is likely to ruffle feathers in Kabul. He proposes that the new supremo be given the title of “adviser”, but this will be portrayed by some people here as foreigners again meddling in Afghan internal affairs.

It was no surprise that Mr Brown also talked once again about handing over more security responsibilities to the Afghan authorities.  I am surprised however that he used the phrase “Afghanisation”, echoing Nixon’s “Vietnamisation”.